Process Instance

Process instance redesign for e-Builder

Project Overview (Quick Glance)

Role: Lead UX Designer – full ownership from research through delivery

Team: UX teammates for peer feedback, plus Design System & Development support teams

Timeline: 7 weeks

Goal: Streamline the “Processes” workflow to improve usability, reduce cognitive load and mitigate risk

Impact:

  • Efficiency gains: Users report 98% task confidence, 96% ease of use - signaling fewer errors and reduced support volume.

  • Client trust: Immediate stakeholder excitement fast-tracked rollout.

  • System value: Delivered reusable templates and components (like sortable tables) into the design system, reducing future design/development effort.

Before:

Old Version

After:

New Version

The Problem

  • Usability tests confirmed low confidence and frustration with excessive steps and scrolling (e.g., poor task fluency)

  • Legacy components clashed with Trimble’s design system, limiting consistency and scalability

  • The client initially requested accordion fixes—but deeper research revealed structural redesigns were required

Design Approach

Goals:

  1. Reduce complexity and cognitive load for users

  2. Align with Trimble’s design system to ensure consistency

  3. Contribute reusable patterns to support future product work

Highlights:

  • Reorganized content hierarchy and streamlined workflows to improve clarity and reduce setup steps.

  • Balanced client expectations with research-driven solutions, ensuring changes addressed root causes rather than surface issues.

  • Designed and contributed reusable components, including advanced tables with filters and modernized form patterns, back into Trimble’s design system for long-term scalability.

Legacy Processes Page - Audited for revamp

Processes Audit

New Processes Page - Includes new feature for creating processes

New Processes

Research & Insights

Methods: UX audit, JTBD canvases, empathy mapping, affinity diagram synthesis and usability studies

Key Findings:

  • Users felt overwhelmed by the layout implied need for better content hierarchy

  • Complexity in workflows with many steps and actors called for clearer organization

  • Users lacked confidence completing tasks in the current workflow opportunity to simplify and validate design

Example of a process workflow

Affinity diagram

Based on the JTBD canvases and other findings gathered from related opportunity maps, I broke down the main categories of data and jobs that would need to need to be accounted for.

Empathy map, prioritization & user stories

I created empathy maps with the above information, prioritized the main jobs I was going to address (green cards) and wrote out some user stories to help guide my design paths.

Outcome & Impact

  • Usability testing metrics soared:

    • 40 invitations sent to participants, I was able to complete a total of 16 studies

    • Of the 10 studies (5 being admin), the results were as follows:

      • Task confidence (completion of the task) 98%

      • Ease of use 96%

      • Usefulness 91%

      • Net Promoter Score - Ease 96%, T2B 100%, 70 NPS, 7 Promoters, 3 Passive, 0 Detractors

      • NPS Usefulness 100%, T2B 100%, 100 NPS, 10 Promoters, 0 Passive, 0 Detractors

  • The client responded with enthusiasm, highlighting user trust and excitement

  • Delivered a consistent, modern UI that serves as a template for future pages, enhancing design system scalability

Reflection & Next Steps

What worked: Starting from user needs, not just client suggestions, allowed us to truly solve the root pain of complexity

What I’d do differently/next: Incorporate deeper accessibility testing (screen readers, keyboard navigation) and validate performance on low-powered devices

What I learned: The value of designing at the system level, contributing reusable components strengthened the design ecosystem beyond this project, while navigating client pushback sharpened my stakeholder management skills.